A depressingly small
number of people seem to care about the Front Mission series of video
games. I mean, obviously, its established in Japan. Its just
when you google it, you get tumble-weeds and Russian-language video
clips. There is an entry on Steam, but its so badly received, I've
not bothered to play it. I did however pick up Front Mission 3 (FM3)
while at a retro-games fair, having happy memories of it. FM3 is what
I like to call a "Lego mecha game", where a majority of
your time is spent swapping parts, refining a team of giant robots
and sending them into battle. It falls into the Strategic RPG genre,
in that its turned-based and set on a grid, while have role playing
mechanics. Such things aren't hugely common these days, and certainly
weren't back then, either. This example is however noteworthy for not
being a licensed game, naming its robots “Wanzers”, and for
being made by Squaresoft at the height of their Play Station power.
Yes, the Final Fantasy people. This franchise should be absolutely
HUGE, but it isn't, due to a lack of localised entries. First
impressions after 20 odd years, running on my PS3?
Its not exactly a
looker.
Making the obvious allowances for age, FM3 is somewhat uneven when it comes to production values. There's no denying the detail and sense of weight that Wanzers have, with some good CG cutscenes at key points, but its not exactly a performance game engine. The image above makes it look better than it does in motion. Its all about brief exchanges of violence, and uses depressively low res sprites for the map screen. The game was criticised for this at the time, IIRC. I've found myself wishing for a HD remake along the lines of Valkyria Chronicles , because while it isn't actually ugly, it does feel like a awkward transitional step like so many of the early polygonal/CD games of its time. And then you remember Armored Core was out 2 years before this, and Final Fantasy 8 was out in the same year..... Of course FM3 probably wasn't meant to be played on a flatscreen. And there's the cleaned up network version that you can play on a Vita, as well as "aftermarket" options. Strategy games aren't really about the graphics, of course, and the game is spectacular on its own terms, but uneven is uneven. Another area where the game has aged poorly is its Internet section, which provides some distractions from the meat of the experience, as well as world building. Sadly, it runs at the speed of dail-up, and doesn't really offer much incentive to keep coming back.
Anyway, despite subjective complaints about presentation, the actual combat system is a pleasing solid one, the kind where simple but elegant concepts get layered atop each other. You can simply just power through the violence like you would with a Final Fantasy, by grinding and simply buying shinier kit, but that's not really clever long term. You need to pay some attention, and experimentation is encouraged. Here's some of the things you need to consider.
1) Wanzers move and attack based on Action Points, which are also used in the enemy turn for defence and counterattack. You therefore have to strike a balance between offence, defence, and positioning.
2) Weapons have differing ranges and AP costs, as well as one of three damage types which a Wanzer could get bonuses against. So, you need the right weapon in the right place.
3) Furthermore, Wanzers have 5 distinct health bars, only one of which being fatal, while weapons alternate between a single big hit or a spray. Again, you need the right weapon in the right place, to wear down, cripple, and finally finish off your target.
4) While having healing items like a common JRPG, these have to be assigned to s specific Wanzer in a dedicated backpack. Certain weapons also have limited ammo, which also have reload items. This will result in design compromises.
5) Punching people is entirely possible due to the high accuracy and low AP cost. Such attacks do however allow the enemy to shoot a Wanzer before it strikes.
6) Finally, Battle Skills break these concepts in various ways, but triggering randomly so you can't rely on them. You can however chain them together for max damage.
I had some immense
fun with all that. There's a some some real chunky goodness to
all this if you care to look into it. The battles are often scripted,
rather than having noteworthy AI, but the game does reward
intelligent and adaptive play. I called this a "Lego mecha game"
earlier, and that is very much the case. You can and should rebuild
your Wanzers as you go, trying to optimise your designs and unlock
new skills. However, if you want a character to keep their original
Wanzer, you can do that too. Components can be upgradef multiple
times, characters often having some handy skill in their starting
mecha. The worst I can say is that a FAQ might be useful, because the
game obscures that sort of information. Here's a video of what you are in for.
I've talked mainly
about combat and how its presented so far, but there is in fact a
story. Two of them. FM3 benefits from 2 lengthy narrative campaigns,
each being the thick end of 40 hours. Which one you get is based on
an innocuous choice, which sees characters switching roles, quite
dramatically in some cases, but the broad-strokes remain the same.
What starts as an espionage thriller, sees the cast flee Japan,
becoming catspaws for a rival superpower, getting involved with a
civil war in future-China, before returning to Japan to take on the
Real antagonists. There's a lot of realpolitik going on, and there's
enough meat to keep you interested, although I regret that its not
really possible to go into the full merits here. The unfortunate
thing is that this is relayed entirely through cutscences, not
gameplay. Its a wall of text, something which I suspect console
gamers of the time didn't welcome. Indeed, it's easy to go on
autopilot with these sections, and maybe miss a few of the meaningful
choices you can make. I did, completely missing one character for 20
odd years. Characters can also blur together after a while, going
out of focus as the narrative forgets about them for a bit. There's
no actual mechanical difference between them, as skills are based
entirely on Wanzer parts, which can be a strength, but if you're
gonna have this much freedom, you may as well allow full character
creation. Either that, or give characters something unique to hang a
hat on. That having been said, the narrative is never less than
engaging, and while I like the gameplay more, seeing where the plot
would go had its pull.
Conclusion
Front Mission 3 is very
good at what it chooses to focus on, but it hasn't aged gracefully. A
lot of the complaint s I make boil down to genre convention; you
don't buy a game such as this for graphics, you buy it for the turned
based combat. That's got a very specific appeal, and while the game
makes efforts to present things well, those efforts were not treated
well by time. Its not a game that' you'd use to convert someone to a
genre, is you get my meaning? Fortunately, the actual gameplay has
held up extremely well, and the story holds your attention. If you
can get past its dated graphics and you're onboard with giant
robots, give it a try. And then wonder where that month went.